Attachment B - Mercury
Containing Products Found in Hospital Settings
Table 1. Alternatives for Mercury-Containing
Thermometers
|
Type of
Thermometer |
Cost |
Accuracy |
Time for
Reading |
Calibration
Frequency |
Comments |
|
Electronic (digital):
oral/rectal |
Thermometer approx.
$300. Disposable covers:
pennies a piece |
Comparable to
mercury |
Oral:
seconds Rectal:
seconds |
Every 6 mo. - 1
year. Some need initial
testing only |
Requires
batteries |
|
Electronic (digital):
tympanic (also called
infrared thermometer) |
Thermometer approx.
$300. Covers: pennies a piece |
Comparable to
mercury |
Seconds |
Every 6 mo. - 1
year. Some need initial
testing only. |
Requires batteries.
Must use “pull and tug” method to get correct placement. |
|
Glass filled with
alloy of gallium, indium, and tin (liquid at room
temperature). |
Approximately
$3 |
Comparable to
mercury |
3
minutes |
None
required |
Breakable |
|
Mercury |
Approximately
$0.40 |
Considered being the
“standard”. |
Oral: 5
min Rectal: 7
min |
None
required |
Breakable. Expensive
disposal. |
Table 2. Alternatives for Mercury-Containing
Sphygmomanometers
|
Type of
Sphygmomanometer |
Cost |
Comments |
|
Aneroid |
Wall model adult: $50
- 80; portable model adult:
$30 - 35 |
Needs calibration
annually. Accuracy comparable
to mercury. |
|
Electronic |
About
$2,000 |
Common where long-term
continuos monitoring is needed, such as intensive
care. |
|
Mercury |
Wall model adult:
$60-70. |
Requires annual
refilling and calibration. Expensive disposal.
|
Table 3. Alternatives for Mercury-Containing
Gastrointestinal Tubes
|
Type of GI
Tube |
Mercury-Free
Alternative and Effectiveness |
|
Bougie Tubes
(esophageal dilators) |
Tungsten. Considered
to be as effective as mercury |
|
Cantor tubes (used to
trace the GI tract) |
Tungsten. Can be
purchased empty of weighting and hospital adds the
tungsten |
|
Miller Abbott tubes
(used to clear intestinal obstruction) |
Tungsten. Can be
purchased empty of weighting and hospital adds the weighting material.
Tungsten is considered to be as effective as
mercury. |
|
Feeding
tubes |
Tungsten. Considered
being as effective as mercury. |
Table 4. Alternatives for Mercury-Containing
Batteries
|
Battery |
Quantity |
Use |
Voltage |
Available
Alternatives |
|
Mercuric oxide
(mercury zinc) |
33-50% by
weight |
Medical |
Multiples of 1.4
v |
Zinc-air (may contain
up to 25 mg mercury, 0.4-1.0% by weight) |
|
Button batteries: Zinc
air |
No federal law, but
addition for mercury over 25 mg prohibited in some states. Manufactures use this standard for
all button batteries |
Medical |
Multiples of 1.4
v |
None |
|
Button batteries:
Alkaline-manganese |
Federal law allows up
to 25 mg mercury |
Consumer |
Multiples of 1.5
v |
Silver oxide (lasts
longer, costs more, does not come in a full range of
sizes) |
|
Button batteries:
Silver oxide |
Contains some mercury
but less than alkaline manganese button batteries |
Consumer |
Multiples of 1.5
v |
None |
Table 5. Alternatives for Mercury-Containing
Laboratory Manometers
|
Type of
Manometer |
Cost |
Comments |
|
Electronic
(digital) |
Several hundred
dollars |
An order of magnitude
more accurate than sphygmomanometers. Used in biomedical laboratory to
calibrate other devices. A
traceable calibration must be performed with a mercury manometer, onsite
or offsite, on a regular schedule. |
|
Aneroid (Bourdon,
diaphragm, piston or capsule types) |
Price varies depending
on accuracy |
Manufactures recommend
calibration at least annually. |
|
Liquid
filled |
Price varies depending
on accuracy |
Inadvisable to move it
from place to place. Manufacturers recommend calibration at least
annually. |
|
Mercury |
$100-$150
range |
One meter tall. An
order of magnitude more accurate than sphygmomanometers. Used in biomedical laboratory to
calibrate devices. Annual calibration
recommended. |
Table 6. Mercury-Containing Electrical
Equipment
|
Type of
Switch |
Where Equipment is
Used |
Possible
Alternative |
|
Tilt
switch |
- Airflow/fan limit
control - Building security
systems - Clothes
iron - Fire alarm
box - Fluid level,
pressure or temperature devices - Laptop computer
screen shutoff - Lids of clothes
washers and chest freezers - Silent light
switch - Space
heater -
Thermostats |
Mechanical
switch |
|
Float
switch |
- Bilge
pumps - Septic
tank - Sump
pump |
- Magnetic dry reed
switch - Optic
sensor - Mechanical
switch |
|
Thermostat |
Temperature control
device may have a mercury tilt switch |
Electronic
thermostat |
|
Reed
delay |
Low voltage, high
precision analytical equipment such as electron
microscope |
Solid state relay,
Electro-optical relay, dry reed delay |
|
Plunger or
displacement relay |
High currents high
voltage applications such as lighting, resistance heating, power supply
switching |
Mechanical
switch |
|
Thermostat
probe |
Electric stoves, hot
water heaters |
Non-mercury
probe |
Table 7. Pharmaceuticals Containing
Mercury
|
Product |
Notes |
|
Merbromin/water
solution |
Used in
plastic/reconstructive surgery as a disinfectant and
marker |
|
Ophthalmic and contact
lens products |
May contain mercury
preservatives: Thimerosal, phenylmercuric acetate, phenylmercuric
nitrate |
|
Nasal
sprays |
May contain mercury
preservatives: Thimerosal, phenylmercuric acetate, phenylmercuric
nitrate |
|
Vaccines |
May contain Thimerosal
(primarily in hemophilus, hepatitis, rabies, tetanus, influenza,
diphtheria and pertussis
vaccines) |
Table 8. Mercury Content of Selected Cleaning
Products
The
mercury-cell process is one of the processes that may be used to manufacture
common ingredients of cleaners and degreasers: sodium hydroxide, potassium
hydroxide, chlorine and hydrochloric acid.
When these chemicals are used to make other products, such as bleach or
soaps, mercury contamination can be introduced in the final product. The Massachusetts Water Resources
Authority (MWRA) and Medical, Academic and Scientific Community Organization,
Inc. (MASCO), through a public-private partnership called the MWRA/MASCO Mercury
Work Group, performed analyses on some of these products. Testing of the products was limited and
many common cleaning products have not been tested. The data should not be used as a
substitute for testing specific products/chemicals.
|
Product |
Mercury Content
(ppb) |
|
Ajax
Powder |
0.17 |
|
Comet
Cleaner |
0.15 |
|
Lysol
Direct |
<0.011 |
|
Soft
Scrub |
<0.013 |
|
Alconox
Soap |
0.004 mg/kg, 0.005
mg/kg, <0.0025 mg/kg (3 tests) |
|
Derm
Scrub |
<5.0, <2.5 (2
tests) |
|
Dove
Soap |
0.0027 |
|
Ivory Dishwashing
liquid |
0.061 |
|
Joy Dishwashing
Liquid |
<0.01 |
|
Murphy’s Oil
Soap |
<0.012 |
|
Soft Cide Soap
(Baxter) |
8.1 |
|
Sparkleen
Detergent |
0.0086 |
|
Sunlight Dishwashing
Detergent |
<0.011 |
Source:
U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine.
http://chppm-www.apgea.army.mil/hmwp/factsheets/mercuryb.htm